Archive for the ‘Howard's Opinion’ Category

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-05-10

Sunday, May 10th, 2009

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-05-03

Sunday, May 3rd, 2009

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-04-26

Sunday, April 26th, 2009

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-04-19

Sunday, April 19th, 2009

$1,000 Fines for Walking Dogs Off-Leash or Failing to Pick Up After Their Mess

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

People who walk their dogs off of a leash or forget to pick up after them in Baltimore will now receive $1,000 fines. While this will no doubt decrease the amount of violators in the city, it’s a very harsh punishment that some could argue is even a bit cruel to dog owners.

The increased fine equates dog walking violations to those of dog fighting and animal abuse. It’s tough to justify such an increase, especially in a time when people are pinching pennies during a rough economy.The new law wasn’t voted on by the people, and there was little to no press about the law before violators started getting fined.

To charge a fine like this to average people will hurt their finances and make it so they can’t afford basic necessities. The fine is a month or two of rent for a lot of people, so charging this much for such a minor offense is ridiculous.

It’s important to keep your dog on a leash when you take it for a walk. It keeps everyone (including your dog) safer, but it’s not a major crime. Picking up after your dog is also important, but the results of the minor infraction don’t have any real effect on society. While walking your dog without a leash can result in your dog biting someone and getting in a fight with another dog, what does not picking up after your pet do?

To charge $1,000 for not picking up after your pet doesn’t make any sense. This just looks like a city’s way to try and gain extra income, but they’re doing it wrong. To take away so much money from pet owners for minor offenses is a terrible way for a city to make money.

The law went into effect on April 1, and citizens who have a problem with it are told to notify their city council members. People who receive the gigantic fine can appeal it in the Environmental Court. Howard being walked on a leash

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-04-12

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-04-05

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Military Dogs Need to Make it Home Safely

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

During the Vietnam War, dogs were used as military scouts and had personal dog handlers. The dogs were an important part of the war effort, but when the war ended, dog handlers had to leave their companions to fend for themselves in a foreign land.

The dogs were left behind as unneeded equipment, disposable objects that would only serve as extra cargo weight. After everything the dogs did to help the war effort, they were shown little respect in return.

When Bill Clinton was president, he passed a law that said dogs could be brought back home during a war effort, but it still isn’t mandatory. We need to make sure our government knows this shouldn’t be an option; dogs should be required to be brought home, just like troops can’t be left after a war.

Dogs are playing an important role in wars now just like there were in Vietnam. Even though laws state that the military can brings dogs back if they want to, it should be a requirement. A lot of money is spent on these wars, and there is no reason why a little bit of that money can’t be spent on ensuring that dogs who serve are taken care of for the rest of their lives.

The cost wouldn’t be too much. If they were able to bring the dogs back home and advertise that these dogs were available for adoption, there would no doubt be lines of people waiting to care for these heroic pups.

God only knows what happened to those dogs who we left behind during the conflicts in Vietnam. We can’t allow the same things to happen to the dogs who are serving now. This is one of those times where we need to learn from the mistakes of our past.

Here are some of the dogs and handlers who were lost, but not forgotten in Vietnam:

Howard Huge on Family Guy

Monday, March 30th, 2009

I was watching the new episode of Family Guy last night and heard Peter Griffin talking about something very interesting. Peter was discussing getting a new dog, because Brian wasn’t behaving like Peter thought he should. This led to Peter suggesting the family get a new dog. First, Peter mentioned getting some other giant dog, but then brought up Howard Huge!

It’s very exciting to know that, in the event something happens to Brian, the Griffin family (or at least Peter) would be open to having Howard Huge in the house.

Family Guy is a little racy for Howard’s taste, but anyone who shows Mr. Huge some love is much appreciated :-)

You can see the reference to Howard Huge on Family Guy below. It isn’t that long, but still pretty cool!

Howard’s Weekly Tweets for 2009-03-29

Sunday, March 29th, 2009